The mightiest of beasts can break doors, but even they cannot break a bridge or a wall, so you could be perfectly safe inside your fortress, unlike in Rimworld where you HAVE to react to raids.
So you can sometimes go years without a siege if the warring civilizations are far away from you or otherwise occupied (or you could have a raid a month if you've settled right next to a necromancer tower).Īnd you can also currently just wait out sieges. While wealth attracts enemies, this is a simulation, there is no storyteller that will go "oh, the player is doing too well, I'll send a raid". I think this could be related to issue 0006868 where sometimes in 40.xx the range of goblin sites was limited to 2 squares. Goblins are immortal beings, dying only to violence and disease. Actually should we make a new report about the unlimited tower range Because I have a save where tower range is still 10 squares like in 34.xx. Defeating a majority of an attacking force usually sends the rest of them running. There's two main differences on that front. Their items can be a valuable source of metals for fortresses that embarked in metal-scarce areas (leading some players to refer to the plunder from a defeated goblin attack as goblinite ). And I hated the constant annoying raids on there but they did add quite a bit, so I was/am trying to figure out what is best for me. I can't help to compare this game with Rimworld, although I know Rimworld is based of DF. But if you embark someplace at least a bit far from goblins and necromancer towers, with rather peaceful surroundings, you shouldn't see enemies straight away. Doesn't appear to be any gypsum on the map, and on embark one of the listed problems was that there was no gypsum available. Couldn't get a dwarven civ that was at war with the gobbos, but oh well. Doubled vampire types, which might increase the number of vamps but I don't know. Worst case scenario, you lose a fortress. Not sure how many titans there are left, but I started off with 100. Originally posted by LaChouette:I'd say to keep them on.
0 kommentar(er)
